Vintage Hollywood Regency Dressing Table by James Mont, 1950s

Details

Description

A rare and important gilt dressing table designed by james mont, produced in the united states in the 1950s. A … Read more A rare and important gilt dressing table designed by james mont, produced in the united states in the 1950s. A key figure in american mid-century design, mont is celebrated for his dramatic, highly individual interpretation of hollywood regency, combining glamour, exoticism, and bold surface treatment. This signed example showcases mont’s distinctive fusion of theatrical luxury and asian-inspired motifs. The façade is articulated with stylised carved bamboo cartouches, arranged in rhythmic relief across the surface, creating depth and visual movement. The table is crafted in solid hardwood and finished in a luminous gilt surface characteristic of mont’s most desirable works. The finish employs mont’s well-documented technique: a base layer of white gold or platinum leaf, overlaid with gold leaf and subsequently brushed to achieve a soft, glowing sheen rather than a mirror polish. This layered gilding gives the surface warmth and subtle tonal variation, enhancing the sculptural quality of the carving. The piece retains mont’s branded signature to the interior, confirming authenticity. Consistent with age and use. The dressing table is structurally sound; however, there is notable surface wear and visible oxidation to the gilded finish throughout. The piece does not retain its original mirror or stool. A professional restoration is recommended to fully revive the intended brilliance and visual impact of the gilding. The current condition has been taken into account in the pricing and may appeal to collectors seeking an authentic, unrestored example by james mont. A striking and rare work by one of the most expressive figures of mid-century american decorative design, suitable as a dressing table, console, or statement piece within a curated hollywood regency or eclectic interior. This piece is attributed to the mentioned designer/maker. It has no attribution mark and no
official proof of authenticity,
however it is well documented in design history. I take full responsibility for any authenticity



issues arising from misattribution See less