Vintage Sculptural Snake Mesh Necklace attributed to Dl Auld Co. / Whiting & Davis, 1970s

Details

Description

This xl silver-toned snake mesh necklace is a sculptural statement piece in a bold vintage style, attributed to dl auld … Read more This xl silver-toned snake mesh necklace is a sculptural statement piece in a bold vintage style, attributed to dl auld co. Based on design and comparable examples.

its fluid, flexible mesh construction allows the necklace to be worn in multiple ways: wrapped as a bracelet, styled as a belt, or worn long or doubled as a necklace. The articulated snake form gives the piece a strong decorative presence while maintaining a soft, elegant drape.

crafted in metal mesh with a reflective silver-tone finish, the body features a scale-like woven texture that catches the light beautifully. The detailed snake head clasp is set with clear rhinestone eyes and decorative sculptural detailing, while the tail end is finely tapered for a naturalistic finish. The clasp construction and ornamental terminals reflect the dramatic costume jewelry design associated with mid-century american makers such as whiting & davis and dl auld co.
these snake mesh necklaces are often incorrectly attributed to whiting & davis, while many examples are in fact most likely produced by dl auld co.

designer: attributed to dl auld co.
origin: united states
style: vintage hollywood regency / statement jewelry
period: mid to late 20th century
materials: silver-tone metal, mesh metal, rhinestones
color: silver
length (approx.): 95 cm
weight: 75 grams

condition
very good vintage condition with light patina and minor discoloration, particularly near the ends of the necklace. Light surface wear consistent with age and use. The mesh remains flexible and the clasp functions properly.

an expressive and versatile vintage jewelry piece with strong sculptural character, ideal for styling with minimal black clothing, evening wear, or layered decorative dressing.
this piece is attributed to the mentioned designer/maker. It has no attribution mark and no
official proof of authenticity,
however it is well documented in design history. I take full responsibility for any authenticity



issues arising from misattribution See less